skip to content
>In Response to the Rose Report

BLOG: In Response to the Rose Report

martin_skelton.gif

The International Primary Curriculum is delighted with very many of the recent recommendations from Sir Jim Rose. Rose’s Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum: Final Report published on April 30th emphasises a move towards a more flexible, less prescriptive and yet challenging and rigorous curriculum that keeps the integrity of individual subjects while helping children to see the links between subjects through a more cross-curricular approach.

Martin Skelton's response:

He wants to see engaged children, subjects and themes combined, integrated assessment for learning, more emphasis on the development of personal skills, and a greater emphasis on enabling children to become confident and independent users of technology.

Rose’s recommendations are not dramatic changes; they are more an identification of good learning practice (taken from present UK models and from around the globe) and placing it into a 21st century context, giving schools and teachers the chance to take back much of the day-to-day responsibility for creating engaging, meaningful learning within their classroom – just what 420 UK primary schools are doing right now with the International Primary Curriculum.

These 420 primary schools are ready for Rose. His recommendations correspond directly to the learning approach that the International Primary Curriculum (IPC) has been helping schools to develop over the past eight years. Take a look:

  • Rose recommends clear outcomes for knowledge, skills and understanding within discrete subjects; with explicit opportunities for learning them in a thematic, cross-curricular way. This exactly reflects the principle framework of the IPC for skill-based, thematic, cross-curricular learning where discrete subjects are separated yet integrated. The IPC emphasises the importance of a very clear awareness of the differences between knowledge, skills and understanding and the implications of this for children’s learning.
  • Rose proposes ICT to be at the core of the primary curriculum. The IPC encourages the use of ICT for both research and recording in many subjects within every thematic unit. The IPC also provides a specialist subject programme for ICT to support the technical skills children require to use ICT effectively.
  • Rose says a curriculum needs to engage and challenge all children. The relevant and creative IPC thematic units of work all address multiple intelligences for primary age children inspiring engagement and providing purposeful, exciting, child-friendly links for learning.
  • Rose aims to develop spoken and written communication and numeracy across the curriculum. Through its cross-curricular approach, each IPC unit separates yet integrates the foundation subjects, enabling links to literacy, numeracy and the spoken word in many subjects within every thematic unit.
  • Rose recommends children learn how to study. The IPC’s Learning to Learn units for children aged 7 to 12 help them to understand how to learn, and how to learn in the best way for them through different learning styles.
  • Rose wants to see a greater emphasis on personal development. Each IPC unit of work focuses on a combination of international and personal learning as well as academic learning for children. Personal learning goals are embedded in each IPC unit of work helping children to become able and inspired learners with good communication, cooperation and enquiry skills, who naturally think from a global perspective.
  • Rose reinforces the Government’s AfL strategy. The IPC’s integrated Assessment for Learning programme focuses on the learning progress of key skills in all foundation subjects plus international mindedness and provides child-focused and teacher rubrics enabling self and peer as well as individual class and whole class assessment.
  • Rose reminds us that children should enjoy their learning. The mission of the IPC is great learning, great teaching and great fun. From the exciting Entry Points to the collaborative, active learning that takes place throughout each IPC unit of work, children learning with the IPC are always having fun.

The IPC welcomes Sir Jim Rose’s recommendations for a new primary curriculum structure, in particular, the opportunity for young children to study in greater depth. Since its introduction in 2000, rigour has always been at the heart of children’s learning in the IPC.

The IPC welcomes too the recommendation that discrete foundation subjects should be crucial components of thematic work. IPC believes that it is important for children to see that they are learning skills specific to history, geography, technology, etc. and that, when set within the context of a big picture theme, this gives children a sense of purpose to their learning of each subject.

However, we think that Rose fails to emphasise one aspect of primary learning enough. Although the report does make reference to increased global learning we believe it to be insufficient. Given the world our children are growing up in is an interdependent one, the IPC believes that enabling children to develop international-mindedness is going to become a key 21st century priority. We remain passionate in our approach to developing international-mindedness within the curriculum.

The IPC believes that the recommendations within the Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum: Final Report - which significantly reflect the same principles as the IPC - are paving the way for better and deeper learning for our primary school children today. We believe 420 UK primary schools and 650 schools around the world already believe that too and, through the IPC, are already ready for Rose, September 2011. Those schools getting set to implement IPC soon will also be ready. Are you ready for Rose?

forum iconUser forum

messages: 14 | pending 4 | stats

Your comments

Please note that postings to this forum are checked by an administrator before they go live on the system. It may take some time for any postings you make to appear within the forum.

[-]
Bravo IPC
3 years ago
Elnofita Prabowo
Our school FIS has implemented IPC. Most of the parents, students and teachers give positive comments on the IPC programs. Thanks IPC team!
[ ]
Re: Bravo IPC
3 years ago
The IPC team
Thanks for this feedback. We are grateful to you for the part you play in making the IPC come alive!
[-]
How International Are You?
3 years ago
I was wondering just how 'international' people make the IPC in their schools. I imagine that in international schools, where children come from a range of international backgrounds to a common host country, this must be fairly automatic. Am I right? But, what about the UK schools? How do you approach the international aspect of IPC? I wonder if sometimes the international section is dropped? Does the school/class 'adopt' a country relevent to each unit? Personally, I teach in a UK school where this was a recent topic of discussion. I tend to try to give an international or global overview and link learning to other countries where this seems relevent. This approach has lead me to consider the global perspective (or at least worldwide geographical view) when planning and teaching, and I am going to survey my pupils on their 'internationalness'. I will then reconsider my take on 'international' before teaching IPC - The second Year.
[-]
Re: How International Are You?
3 years ago
Martin
Jan Thanks for the reply. The questions you raise are good ones - and ones we think about a lot. I think schools take the IPC on board for all sorts of different reasons - because they think the curriculum they already use doesn't provide children with much excitement, because they want to link subjects and themes rigorously, because they want to focus on learning rather than just activities and so on. Helping their chldren develop a more international focus is yet another reason for joining the IPC. So, schools come to the different elements of the IPc at different times depending on what they most want it to do for them. But schools that do want to use it to help the development of an international dimension do try to make sure that their children look at each of the different issues from a broader perspective beginning with other children and adults they know and then moving out from there. They also help children to make links with children in schools in other parts of the world as they study the IPC Units of Work and so on. It is true that not all IPC schools focus on the development of international mindedness as soon as they become members of the IPC, but this is because they - rightly- feel that they have different priorities. But some schools do, and we have fantastic examples of the work they have done. It's thrilling. Martin
[ ]
Re: How International Are You?
2 years ago
Kath G
I think that it does not really matter the type of school you teach in - international or UK based- international mindedness is a way of life. The kids learn to embrace international thinking as par for the course it is an integral part of their learning that is modelled by adults/teachers. It is indeed possible to be teaching internationally and have a distinct lack of international thinking. Just because the school has an international day does not make it an internationally minded school. So what I say is this: embrace international thinking, be the spearhead of moving the children's thinking and learning forward through international mindedness. Make it part of their lives, at home and at school. Good luck, I love it when my kids are caring international thinkers, it brings a whole new dimension to their learning. Kath
[-]
Sharing ideas with other schools
3 years ago
alex llewellyn
We are constantly evolving and developing the way that we use IPC in our school and would like to be able to discuss issues with other schools. Do you know how I could contact other schools in our area for a chat or a visit and maybe share ideas/resources? Our school is in Bradford in the UK.
[ ]
Re: Sharing ideas with other schools
3 years ago
The IPC Team will help you to link up with schools in your area and if you would like to host an IPC Network meeting at your school they will help to organise this for you. For assistance please telephone the IPC office or email janice@greatlearning.com
[ ]
Re: Sharing ideas with other schools
3 years ago
Elnofita
Dear Alex , I'm one of the IPC teachers at FIS Indonesia. It will be my pleasure to share our IPC implementation with you Alex! Elnofita
[-]
Negative comments about the IPC from Chris Woodhead in UK's Sunday Times
2 years ago
A parent asks in the Sunday Times (sept 20) what Woodhead thinks of the IPC. He states that he thinks that the school's decision to purchase the IPC was a "very serious" and in his view "damaging decision". He is critical of children being able to make links between subjects and that the curriculum will not help children when they move to an academic secondary school. Rather damming comments from Woodhead. I know many of our parents read the paper and would welcome suggestions for rebuttals when they come in waving the column in the office tomorrow.
[ ]
Re: Negative comments about the IPC from Chris Woodhead in UK's Sunday Times
2 years ago
Chris Woodhead Agrees with the IPC! Chris Woodhead made some interesting comments about the IPC last week, particularly focused around subject teaching and subject rigour. He's made the same comments before so we just want to surprise him (and perhaps you) with our response. Here it is, in three parts: First - and here's where the surprise might be - we agree with Chris about the importance of subject rigour. He is right. Second - you already know that subject rigour is a crucial part of the IPC; you know how the IPC has been designed to make sure that each unit of work focuses on the independence and the interdependence of subjects. Unfortunately, we don't think that Chris has rigorously looked at the IPC so he doesn't really get it. Third - as you may know, Chris is part of a group that runs schools. What you may not know is that amongst our nearly 800 members you'll find part of Chris's school group too. In making their choice, they have done the rigorous work that Chris hasn't. Chris can be a challenging man. On this occassion though, please don't let any stereotypical views affect your judgement. The issue Chris raises is an important one and the IPC provides an answer in a way that is rigorous and stimulating to children. We're writing to Chris to invite him to look at the IPC more closely.
[-]
IPC Assessment and Reports
2 years ago
As a school we are going to implement IPC from September 10 and we are trying to develop our report format to link more to the IPC. Do you know how I could contact other IPC schools to share assessment and report formats?
[ ]
Re: IPC Assessment and Reports
2 years ago
Please contact the IPC office and ask to speak to one of the IPC Team or email members@internationalprimarycurriculum.com A member of the IPC Team will be able to give you contact details of a school that will be able to assist you. Thank you.
[ ]
Resources
2 years ago
Has anyone got any good resources that they have used for 'Making the News?'
[ ]
A4L Database
2 years ago
We (RIS Eindhoven) just started the A4L last year. This year all teachers fill in the A4L database. We assess the same goal twice a year. Now the first problem comes up. Last Unit a teacher assessed an ICT goal. Now she is at the point that she assess the same goal for the second time. But if she does that "the old" assessment dissapears, so you can't see the progress on the database. How can we deal with this problem???

Post a message (show)(hide)